Muslim who helped stop NYC Hanukkah attack on Jews gets award says the headline in Newsday - which is a newpaper that specifically targets Long Island, NY.
A Muslim student who helped stop a Hanukkah attack on four Jewish subway riders is being honored for his actions.
Basically, 4 people on a train wish each other "Happy Hanukkah", 10 others (of un-named spiritual affliliations) take some exception and decide to do some biffo, and one muslim student gets involved to help and manages to put in some useful distraction.
Askari [the "hero"]tried to fight off the 10 attackers, giving Adler [one of the victims] a chance to summon police by pulling an emergency brake.
Is this "good news", or "bloody awful humanity at its worst with an intervention that prevented something really nasty happening"?
Quite possibly there was something published at the time of the initial attack (mid November).
Yes; it is good that
Someone Helped out strangers in need
Yes; it is good that
It was an act of inter-faith support against those less tolerant
Yes; it is good that he is being "recognised" for his good deed
BUT
Does the stopping of a wrong, in and of itself make it "Good News"?
In the standard definition, I would say "Yes definitely", but I must admit, I don't know whether or not this matches the "mission statement" I set up for this blog.
OK; by the same token is
‘Miraculous’ Recovery for Man Who Fell From Sky this "good news"?
"Alcides Moreno plunged 47 stories that morning last month, clinging to his 3-foot-wide window washer’s platform as it shot down the dark glass face of an Upper East Side apartment building. His brother Edgar, who had been working with him, was killed when the platform landed."
"He was given 24 units of blood and 19 units of plasma and underwent an operation to open his abdomen in the emergency room because, his doctor said, they did not want to risk moving him to an operating room. As December went on, he endured nine orthopedic operations."
You get the picture. And yes, he regained consciousness on xmas day.
So that makes it a nice "christmas miracle" - and the news doesnt get better than that.
But - of course, it shouldn't have happened in the first place. And of course, unfortunately, his brother perished in the fall.
Ok, I'm going all "glass half empty" here, which is NOT be at all, generally.
But maybe we only find "news fit to be published" when it is really empty, half empty, or Lindsay-bloody-Lohan.
Or when Bill Gates plows another 100 million into malaria, tb and aids. But then, I could (in this mood), argue that is not really good news because,
- Bill Gates made his money from all sorts of anti-trust monopolies on sloppy, buggy, insecure software (hey, that ain't my quote, and I do appreciate that he is doing more than most of the sovereign donors)
- malaria, tb, and hiv/aids are nasty in the first place anyway
So there we go.
Help me either define "good news", or help me find stuff that isn't based around "glass half empty".